The Great Divide
Michael Hoffman •
May
2, 2017
Delusion that is so intense it constitutes hallucination is
nothing new. When the movie moguls chose to foist upon the
public the definitive character assassination of the
dissident English historian David Irving with their
“Denial” film, it flopped at the box office,
despite an A-list cast and top notch production values. But
what “Denial” revealed about the insecurities
of the “Holocaust” lobby was priceless: despite
the image they project of omniscient certainty that the
matter of Auschwitz’s homicidal gas chambers is
definitively settled, and all who doubt are
“deniers,” the movie-makers themselves have
their own doubts!
The “Denial” movie is a gem for revisionists
because of its admission that so-called “Holocaust
survivors” can’t be called to the witness stand
in criminal or civil court where there is an astute
cross-examiner present, like David Irving in his libel suit
against Deborah Lipstadt, or defense attorney Doug Christie
during the 1985 Zundel trial. What does this say about the
quality of their “testimony” when it cannot
withstand knowledgeable cross-examination? This stunning
admission from the movie “Denial” severely
undercuts the Holocaustianity which has been elevated to a
hallowed position of unassailable Sacred Dogma, which only
a lunatic, neo-Nazi or an “anti-Semite” would
contradict.
The Six Million kabbalism is only part of a wider
epistemology which embraces Charles Fort’s study of
the effect of belief in anomalies on humans. Fortean
epistemology is not concerned particularly with
“solving” the mystery of UFOs or Bigfoot, for
example, but in studying the effect of belief in those
anomalies on humans who accept them as true.
Reading Charles Fort (especially the last two of his four
books) and Eric Hoffer’s The True
Believer, led me to
start to scrutinize the phenomenon of partisan cheerleading
for “our side.” About 20 years ago this writer
began to examine Right wing myths that were supposedly
incumbent on a revisionist to believe. This is an oxymoron
of course, since revisionism is not a belief system or a
political framework for Left wing or Right wing
triumphalism. It is the enemy of dogma and it subjects
everything to a new vision (re-vision)
based on the discovery of heretofore unknown facts. Asking
a revisionist, “Whose side are you on?” ought
to be futile. The true revisionist is on the
“side” of a forever-digging historiography.
Partisans may agree with that idea in principle, but when
the revisionist practices what he preaches they may howl,
withdraw support, attack, calumniate or stalk angrily off.
This occurred when we took a look at the boatload of Right
wing nonsense floated over the past eighty years concerning
the English Stuart King Charles I and the Puritan Army
Commander Oliver Cromwell. Charles was put forth as an
enemy of usury, Judaism and the occult. The Puritans were
portrayed as Jew-worshipping pawns who opened the borders
of Britain to the hordes of Antichrist for filthy
lucres’ sake. I discovered that none of that cartoon
was true and that the beneficiaries of the hoax were the
partisans of the Church of Rome. The story had been given
legs by Archibald Ramsay in The
Nameless War and by Hilaire
Belloc, a talented prose stylist who is something of a lay
saint to conservative Catholics.
Our research (in the newsletter Revisionist
History®),
turned up the fact that Charles I and his Romanist wife
were up to their necks in usury, Judaism and proto-masonic
networks; that it would be his son, King Charles II, who
first initiated Judaic immigration into England in earnest
and not the Puritans, whose Parliament had in fact rebuffed
Cromwell. Belloc’s “histories” of the
Stuart monarchs are a palimpsest of fraud (or rank
incompetence — he wrote hurriedly for money at this
point in his career). Belloc himself was a usurer (he
loaned at interest to his own family) and his definition of
usury was the same defective one that had been modified by
the situation ethics of the popes of the 16th century
forward. Were these revisionist revelations welcomed? By
some, yes. By many, no. I had let “our side”
down, wink, wink. Wasn’t I aware that revisionism was
just a device for making certain Protestants and most
“Jews” look bad? Exposing the errors of
“Saint” Belloc was also unforgivable.
What happened to all the high-minded ideals that we cast in
the face of our enemies? “Truth at any cost,”
no matter whose toes are stepped on? “Sacred cows
make the tastiest hamburger,” etc. For some people
these are slogans that are employed in the war of ideas,
nothing more. They believe we must win at any cost, with
Machiavellian tactics behind a revisionist mask.
We discovered this again when we found at some cost, that a
substantial portion of “Holocaust revisionism”
is a project of rehabilitating the reputation of Adolf
Hitler in order to have his movement resurrected. Yes, that
sounds like a B-movie Hollywood script and when aimed at
all revisionists or perhaps even the majority it is
probably grossly unfair. But in our experience it is true
of at least a substantial minority, maybe nearly half of
WWII revisionists.
When we began to research two areas of Hitler’s
curriculum vitae that were not as well studied as other
aspects of his life, the findings did not bode well for his
cult following. We looked at Corporal Hitler in World War I
and its aftermath. Of the fact that he was a courageous
soldier possessed of reckless disregard for his own life is
not something we contest. But of his claim (and it was
hardly his alone) that Germany had lost the war because of
a Judaic “stab in the back,” there was almost
no evidence. They lost the war mainly because they were
burdened with the policies of obstinate and obtuse German
generals; scapegoating Judaics in this regard was part of
the Cryptocracy’s plan to extrude the mass of
patriotic, Talmud-despising German Judaics, who identified
with German culture and saw themselves as Germans first.
The rabbis wanted these German-Judaics destroyed and Hitler
was their avenging angel in this regard. After that issue
of our newsletter was published many subscriptions were
canceled.
More cancellations would follow when we researched and
published the first new biography of Gregor Strasser in
years. He was the National Socialist anti-usury leader (and
master organizer) who was very inconvenient to have on hand
after Hitler came to power and proceeded to buttress the
very usurious forces he had campaigned against. Gregor
Strasser was framed for a non-existent plot against the
fuhrer and murdered (Leon Degrelle seconded Hitler’s
lies about Gregor). More subscriptions were canceled after
those facts were published. Hallucination trumps history
not just among “the Jews” and “the
Republican neoncons,” but among some of our own
people.
To disenchant people of cherished delusions is a lonely
vocation. Human nature being what it is, history teaches
that people demand enchantment, a word which has come to be
associated with love and beauty, but which has no
association with truth, without which there is no authentic
love or beauty.
Not to worry about us, however. Some of what “history
teaches” has been put in suspended animation by this
strange era of ours in which the clock on the wall of
destiny is at five-minutes-to-midnight, and ticking. As we
lost readers who were possessed by the same epistemology as
the rabbis (“My-way-or-the-highway”), we kept
or even attracted authentic revisionists and information
connoisseurs. Thanks to that diehard readership we’re
still here.
Which brings us to my book The Occult Renaissance Church of
Rome which has
just been published. This volume is a study in the
laboratory of human delusion where five or more mutually
contradictory beliefs are held by the papists; where
monk Martin Luther’s Augustinian Superior General
is a leader of the Cryptocracy; where the Kabbalah and
Talmud are advanced by pontiffs known to consensus
history as Judaism’s toughest adversaries, and
where the primordial malignity of Pharaonic Egypt
becomes the secret religion of the robber Church of
Rome, which usurped the genuine Catholic and Apostolic
Church of Dante, Francis of Assisi and Anthony of Padua.
Revisionist history consists in the never-ending enterprise
of digging for facts in a cosmos where the original sin of
our own subjectivity is forever leading us astray. The
resistance to that allure is the task of the revisionist
historian.
At its most fundamental level, the division among people is
not between Republicans and Democrats; Judaics and
gentiles; Protestants, Muslims and Catholics; or blacks and
whites or rich and poor. It is between those who seek the
truth at all costs, no matter how damaging and disruptive
to their own prized and revered beliefs, and those who
prefer the comfort of a lie. That, ladies and gentleman, is
the great divide.
Michael Hoffman
is the author of a new book, The Occult
Renaissance Church of Rome. You can order
it
here.
Copyright©2017 Revisionisthistory.org
For
Further Research:
REVISIONIST
HISTORY NEWSLETTER NO. 74
“RIGHT WING MYTHS WITH AN ENDLESS SHELF LIFE."
Was
John Calvin a "Jew"? Were the English Puritans who
overthrew King Charles I agents of the Judaic Money
Power? Did Oliver Crowell readmit the Judaics to
England? Many non-Zionist Right-wingers believe the answer
to all three of these questions is yes. It is our hope
that uncovering these Big Lies will serve to
illustrate a defective epistemology. 20 page
magazine.
USA
price $10.00.
Canada: $11.00.
Foreign: $12.00
REVISIONIST
HISTORY NEWSLETTER NO. 75
: "CORPORAL
HITLER IN THE FIRST WORLD WAR." On the
hundredth anniversary of the start of the fratricide,
revisionist historian Michael Hoffman clears away the myths
and disinformation surrounding Hitler’s military
record from 1914 to 1918. What did the young Hitler
actually do in the war? Did he deserve the Iron Cross?
How was he viewed by his fellow soldiers? What
were his authentic views of “the Great
War”? At long last here is reliable, objective
information that may surprise you, based on the latest
cutting edge research and
testimony. Also
in this issue:
“Resurrection Denial: A Cosmic Evil in Our
Midst.” Government, the Churches and the media all
obsess about and denounce “Holocaust denial”
while the
organized denial of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ merits
little or no protest or outrage.
USA price $9.00.
Canada: $10.00.
Foreign: $11.00
REVISIONIST
HISTORY NEWSLETTER NO. 80: HITLER
HAD HIM MURDERED: GREGOR STRASSER, THE GERMAN VISIONARY WHO
COULD HAVE LED HIS NATION TO A NEW BIRTH OF
FREEDOM.
The Untold
History of the Exemplary Life and foul Assassination of one
of the Greatest German Leaders of the 20th
century.
USA price $10.00.
Canada: $11.00.
Foreign: $12.00
TO ORDER: U.S.
Customers pay by check, money order or Discover card, VISA
or Mastercard (please provide your account number and
expiration date).
Canada
and
Overseas pay by International Postal Money Order, a check
in US dollars from a US bank, or Discover card, VISA or
Mastercard (please provide your account number and
expiration date).
Be sure to specify what you are ordering and include your
complete address.
Send your payment to:
Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene,
Idaho 83816 USA.
Checks must
clear our bank first before orders can be shipped. Idaho
residents please add 6% sales tax. Thank you!
E-mail:
hoffman[at]revisionisthistory.org (substitute @ for "at" in
the preceding address)
Home |
News Bureau |
Bookstore |
Desideraturm
Donations |
Mission Statement
Legal
Notice
Revisionist
History® is a registered trademark of
Independent
History & Research
Box
849 • Coeur d'Alene •
Idaho
•
83816
•
USA
__________________________
Copyright©1996-2017
All
Rights Reserved