Talmudic rite of circumcision exposed in graphic California
comic book
The preceding is
excerpted from Foreskin Man vol. 1. no. 2.
Foreskin
Man is written and
edited by Matthew Hess
I doubt that Mr. Hess would recognize any distinctions
between Talmudic and Biblical circumcisions, but he should.
For the record, the evil rite of the
rabbinic bris
milah (circumcision) is based on
Talmud-derived halacha
and custom
(minhag);
not the Bible. The Bible does not authorize
any use of metzitzah
b'peh.
In metzitzah
b'peh, the mohel
(rabbinic
circumciser) performs fellatio on the infant boy by placing
the infant's penis in his mouth and sucking the blood from
the circumcised member. Thus in Orthodox Judaism, but not
in the Bible, one of the first experiences a Judaic male
baby undergoes in his life is submitting to
fellatio. There is nothing even
remotely comparable in the Bible. Judaism is an anti-Biblical
religion.
Two other issues: 1. Matthew Hess is unaware of a painless
form of circumcision pioneered by pediatricians in Arizona.
A pediatrician in Sandpoint, Idaho is an expert in this
technique. Orthodox Judaics are not allowed to use this
technique for the very reason that it is painless.
Orthodox Judaism
requires that the ritual be painful. Cf. Mishnah Shabbath
19:2 and BT Shabbat 133b. The Old Testament does not demand
pain in circumcision. This distinction is important.
2. In
Foreskin Man issue no. 2, Mr. Hess
approvingly depicts the kidnapping of the Judaic infant to
rescue him from the circumcision. This seriously mars his
work.
A couple of other caveats: there is a gratuitously lewd
drawing of a scantily clad female in the "Coronado Islands"
panel (panel #7 of the comic book; not shown above). This
too detracts from the work for the obvious reason that it
demeans women by portraying them as objects of lust. Also,
the mohel
is drawn without a
mustache. I know of no Orthodox Judaic mohel
who wears a beard
and performs metzitzah
b'peh, who would shave his mustache.
Drawing the mohel
without a mustache
is inaccurate. It erroneously gives him a more Amish than
rabbinic appearance.
--Michael
Hoffman, author of Judaism Discovered
A statement
released on June 3 by the San Francisco office of the
Anti-Defamation League called the comic "grotesque" as well
as "disrespectful and deeply offensive." In an interview
Hess did not back down from the 12-page book, which he
estimates cost him a little less than $10,000 to produce.
"I would consider 'Foreskin Man' No. 2 to be a success. It
was intended to provoke," Hess said. "Monster Mohel was
based on actual photographs, as were Jorah and Yerik," Hess
said, referring to the villain and his henchmen. "He's got
the white eyes, the beard is a little different, but
there's not much different from a real live mohel. I did
add the Uzis. "I think a lot of Jewish people were angry
about that because it exposes brit milah for what it is,"
Hess added.
-San
Francisco Sentinel, June 25, 2011
www.revisionisthistory.org
News Bureau |
Home
____________________